ObamaCare is a word coined by those who oppose the
Affordable Care Act, but President Obama has embraced the term. If we re-elect
him and preserve it, a new study shows we’ll soon begin to see powerful results
of the law on one of the biggest factors leading to poverty.
Imagine for a moment that there is a medicine with no
significant side effects, which if given freely to those who want it, prevents
a condition that causes 34 out of a thousand young people to miss significant
work time, often leading them to leave the workforce or drop out of school.
People who live with the condition are usually affected for at least 18 years,
and many fall into poverty and require government assistance during some or all
of these years, especially those who have recurring bouts of the condition. In
order to avoid some of the effects of this condition, on average fifteen of a
thousand elect a procedure that is considered shameful by many.
By now, you probably realize I’m talking about pregnancy,
and the medicine to avoid it is birth control. A recent two year study of 9,000
young women in St. Louis that got little fanfare (small notice near the classifieds in the Charleston Gazette, Oct. 5th ) shows dramatic results in reducing teen pregnancies
and abortions. According to the AP
release, “When price wasn’t an issue, women flocked to the most effective
contraceptives—the implanted options, which typically cost hundreds of
dollars…” The result was 80% fewer teen pregnancies and one-third the abortions
of national averages. As Ed Rabel pointed out in his recent entreaty to improve
sex education for our teens (Charleston Gazette, Oct. 8), West Virginia, with
the 8th highest rate of teen pregnancies among states, has potential
to reduce rates even further.
Even if the only legacy of ObamaCare were a dramatic
national reduction in teen pregnancy and abortion, the program would likely be
seen in the future as having significantly reduced poverty and largely solved a
thorny national problem. Imagine how
many girls might avoid the pitfalls of young motherhood and instead finish
school, find gainful employment, and then marry and raise a family when they
are better prepared emotionally and economically for parenthood. Imagine how
many children will avoid the fate of being raised by an overburdened,
underprepared teenager or shuffled around to relatives or foster parents who
may only grudgingly care for them. Yet birth control is just one of many
provisions of the Affordable Care Act that are likely to improve health and
reduce poverty.
I would think the pro-life movement would rally behind
ObamaCare once they learned of its dramatic effectiveness in reducing abortion,
not to mention the expected impact on poverty. To someone opposed to abortion,
someone who believes abortion is tantamount to murder, would it not in these
circumstances be immoral to oppose provisions in the Affordable Care Act that
provide for birth control without co-pays? Mitt Romney has flip-flopped on many
issues before and during his run for president, but he continues to say at
every opportunity that he would repeal ObamaCare on day one of his presidency.
This is one more reason not to allow him a chance.
No comments:
Post a Comment